The Privileged Polymer
now playing at a theater near you
This lavishly produced movie documents our finely tuned universe, which was
designed for chemistry and for chemists to do chemistry.
By Azo Mazur
Fellow of the reDiscovery Institute
Unless you've been hiding under a rock, you've heard about the intelligent design
movement and some of its leading intellects - Azo Mazur, Mike Behe, Willie Dembski,
Ann Coulter and William Bennett. Moral giants, surely. Unfortunately, you also heard the
mainstream media's negative spin. They use quotations supposedly representing the view
of all "serious chemists," along with the phrase "overwhelming evidence of chemical
periodicity".
Desperate Midwives
So what is design theory? Design theory is the comforting and popular argument that the natural world is best explained as the result of an intelligent agency. The universe is so complex and so finely tuned that it could not have been created by random chance or blind luck. Design theory is science with a moral and ethical compass. It is based on evidence and only coincidentally on Genesis. Design theory reduces the complex and frightening universe to a binary system of good and evil, exposing morality and clear transcendent truth.
Natural science, in contrast, is the unsettling and harsh view of nature promoted by blue state PhDs. Nature must submit to deterministic laws. Scientific information must be attained by verifiable, reproducible means. Natural science blindly requires empiricism, experimentation, repeatable methodology, prelims, peer review, and publication. Natural science is based on a frightening faith in reason and rationality. Natural science denies revelation, miracles, good and evil, and everlasting life. Stalin was an atheist.
Onto the odious edifice of natural science, Dimetri Mendeleev hoisted a conjecture that
the properties of atoms vary in a periodic fashion with atomic weight. In spite of
serious flaws in Mendeleev's theory- the sorting by atomic weight was switched to
atomic numbers, element 118 was added then removed, etc. - chemists continue to teach that complex molecules around us - and in us - grow from a purposeless and amoral process called bonding. Bonding seizes and joins atoms together, forcing them to inter-penetrate in acts of molecular pornography. Mendeleev and his followers (Mendeleevists) explain away the apparent
design in the chemical world, the beauty of gold and diamonds, the stoniness of stone,
sandiness of sand, the soapiness of soap, the dirtiness of dirt, the filthiness of filth, as subjective, as only apparent. In this
nihilist view, humans are just conglomerates of molecules arising from blind chance
and bonding. The laws of thermodynamics, chemical periodicity and quantum mechanics
rule chemical and biochemical processes. Polymerization is the illicit love child of
luck and chemistry.
The chemical elite, largely atheists, control us. They allow us to believe whatever we
want in church on Sunday, but force us to bow down to the periodic table once we enter
the lab or the classroom. Undergraduate students who cite purpose or design or god in
their laboratory reports receive poor grades and bad recommendations.
The Universe Strikes Back
There is one problem with this tidy rule. Nature forgot to cooperate. We explain how
in our documentary, "The Privileged Polymer" - playing at a theater near you. Critics
have described it as "Jesus Christ Superstar crushes Bill Nye the Science Guy". "The
Privileged Polymer" incorporates information from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics. The movies uses slick computer animation to present spectacular images of
reactants, products, transition states and more, all being manipulated by the
intelligent designer (not shown). The result is an extraordinary 60-minute documentary
and a fascinating look at a timeless question: What is our significance within the
grand scheme of molecules?
As told in "The Privileged Polymer," the properties of atoms - carbon-carbon bonds are
stable, carbon forms four bonds, carbon forms a tetrahedron - appear finely tuned for
formation of complex molecules. If carbon-carbon bonds were unstable, the world as we
know it would be impossible. This fine-tuning is clear proof of the work of a
"designer."
There is more (see the movie!). We document that even in this finely tuned universe,
local conditions such as temperature, pressure and concentration have to be just right
to form a given molecule. Incredibly, the best conditions for bonding and chemical
reactions are not so different from the most healthy conditions for chemists. Earth
has lots of molecules and lots of chemists. Outer space has fewer types of molecules
and no chemists at all. The most chemical-friendly region of the galaxy is also the
best place to be a chemist. A coincidence? Hardly. This linkage proves that the
universe was designed for chemistry and for chemists to do chemistry.
"The Privileged Polymer" disproves chemist Lodless Giberal, who famously put it,
"Mendeleevism excites me. Our shameful urges have molecular origins. I never say,
'Jeez, I'd like to evade taxes and exceed the speed limit, but that would violate
Mendeleevism.' Mendeleevists don't have to think like that. Mendeleevism lets us off
the hook morally. This is why Mendeleevism has persisted in spite of obvious flaws. We
like it."
The G-word
Now, at the beginning of the 21st century, we have powerful techniques such a thin
layer chromatography, rotary evaporation, and phenolphthalein indicator. We have
intellectual and moral giants such as Azo Mazur, Willie Dembski, Ann Coulter, Mike
Behe and Bill Bennett. Standing in the way are Mendeleevists and their periodic table.
Recently Nobel-prize nominee Azo Mazur asked, "What is the purpose or meaning of
molecules? Or of phase transitions? Or of second-order kinetics? If chemistry has a
purpose, then molecules, equilibrium and kinetics must reflect this purpose. This
purpose should be openly and carefully discussed."
Unfortunately, few are brave enough to follow Mazur's advice. If one writes about chemical
design, god, angels, or the devil in an undergraduate laboratory report, one gets
points deducted. If one writes about revelation and miracles in a submission to JACS,
one is subject to scathing reviews and rejection by editors. In our current climate,
even the bare mention of virgin birth in a chemical publication causes some to reach for their
stash of derisive terms -
"theocrat," "fundamentalist," "creationist," "charlatan," "con artist," "hack," "fool," "idiot,"
"resident of Cobb County, Georgia."
But that response rings increasingly hollow. The secular Mendeleevists are in retreat.
The genie is out of the bottle, and name-calling and misinformation won't put him
back. With the reDiscovery Institute on the scene, the Mendeleevists
can no longer control the flow of information to those who seek it. It's time to see
the movie, "The Privileged Polymer", playing at a theater near you.